These are the general requirements of the Department of Anthropology. Each subdiscipline also has its own additional guidelines and requirements. All students in the Ph.D. program are expected to satisfy the academic performance requirements of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, which can be found in The Graduate School Bulletin’s General Requirements section. Similarly, all subdisciplinary requirements are in addition to those set out here for the department as a whole.
Universal Department Requirements
Students are expected to receive their AM degree by the end of their second year or fourth semester of full time study.
1. Theory Requirement (472 – Social Theory and Anthropology). All students are required to take Anthropology 472 in their first year. Under special circumstances this requirement may be delayed or waived by petitioning the entire departmental faculty.
2. Two Subdisciplinary Course requirements. All students must complete at least one course taught by a faculty member of the anthropology department in each of the two subdisciplines other than their own; Anthropology 472 may satisfy the sociocultural requirement. Students with good cause to substitute prior extensive coursework in the subdiscipline, especially in the context of a Master’s degree at another university, for one or both of the other subdisciplinary requirements may petition the relevant subdisciplinary faculty to do so.
3. Courses with Six Faculty. All graduate students are required to have had courses with at least six different departmental faculty members. Team-taught courses may count for both faculty members.
4. Credit Hours. The anthropology department requires 36 credit hours for the award of an A.M. degree without thesis; 24 credit hours are required for an A.M. degree with thesis.
5. Petition for the Award of the Masters Degree. Once a student has completed all requirements for the A.M. degree, the student and his or her adviser submit a petition to the chair; the chair circulates the petition to the entire faculty and forwards it to the graduate school. This petition should include documentation of satisfactory completion of all the graduate school requirements (including cumulative credits, thesis if one was done, and grade point average), the three requirements listed above (1-4), as well as any special requirements set by the student’s subdiscipline (see the relevant subdisciplinary document). Sample petitions are available in the academic coordinator’s office.
All A.M. degree requirements are also requirements for doctoral candidacy whether the student actually receives the A.M. degree or not. Continuation for the Ph.D. involves being advanced to doctoral candidacy.
Students are expected to complete the degree in five to seven years.
Proposal defenses and admission to doctoral candidacy are expected by the end of the third year. At this time students should have completed all the Ph.D. requirements except for the dissertation.
1. Student-Specific Requirements for Doctoral Candidacy. Students may be asked by their committees to fulfill additional requirements, directly relevant to their doctoral dissertation research, prior to admission to candidacy. These may include a foreign language or specialized training outside of the Anthropology Department in other areas such as statistics, computer programming, or laboratory techniques. Students will be formally notified by their committees of such additional requirements.
2. Defense of the Doctoral Proposal. All students must defend a doctoral proposal prior to admission to Ph.D. candidacy. Proposals must be defended before a faculty committee consisting of a minimum of three full-time tenured or tenure track members of the anthropology faculty.
3. Petition for Admission to Doctoral Candidacy. Once a student’s doctoral proposal has been successfully defended and all other requirements set by the graduate school, anthropology department, subdiscipline, and the student’s committee have been met, the student and adviser should submit a petition to the chair for advancement to candidacy; the chair will then inform the entire faculty and forward the petition to the graduate school. Petitions should be in the form of a memorandum explaining how all of the requirements were satisfied. Sample petitions are available in the academic coordinator’s office. At the end of the third-year students must also file a Title, Scope and Procedure of Dissertation form.
4. Teaching Requirement. Students entering in Fall 2010 or after must fulfill the following teaching requirements:
4.1 Attendance at 5 Teaching Center or Anthropology Department Teaching/Professional workshops
4.2 The mandatory campus-wide TA Orientation counts as one workshop towards this fulfillment.
4.3 Four professional presentations (at professional conferences or formal talks in the department or elsewhere on campus)
4.4 Participation as a Teaching Assistant in at least one course taught by an Anthropology Department faculty member
4.5 Teaching a course at Washington University, University College, or another accredited institution (or demonstration of equivalent experience by petition to the Graduate Committee of the Department.
4.6 Meet with the Department Teaching and Professionalization Faculty Advisor at least twice (in second and third year)
Students entering the program in Fall 2004, 2005, 2006 will adhere to the previous requirements (14 units of basic teaching, 4 units of advanced teaching, such as presenting papers at professional meetings). Students entering the program in Fall 2007, 2008, 2009 will have the option of following the previous or new system.
5. The Doctoral Dissertation. The doctoral dissertation must constitute an integrated, coherent original work, whose parts are logically connected to each other. Normally, the doctoral dissertation consists of a sequence of integrated chapters that introduce the dissertation research, provide the background and the methods for the research, present and interpret the results, and then tie the various portions of the dissertation together in a concluding chapter, with appropriate citations.
In this context, it may be appropriate for the dissertation to consist in part of research articles that have been written (and may be published) by the graduate student during the course of the doctoral research. Whether this dissertation format is appropriate for a given dissertation (within a subfield that accepts such a dissertation) needs to be determined a priori by the student and her/his doctoral committee. Should it be deemed appropriate, it must have an introductory chapter that provides the theme and core questions of the dissertation research and that explains the relationship(s) between the constituent chapters and parts, and it must also have a concluding chapter that brings together the information and ideas expressed in the thesis, relates them to the introduction, and shows how they constitute a coherent whole. (See Minimal requirements for dissertations for the GSAS requirements regarding a dissertation that includes previously written materials.)
Evaluation of Students
Student progress is monitored by the entire faculty in the first and second years.
1. First Year Evaluation of All Students. At the end of each student’s first year in the program, the faculty will complete a formal evaluation of their progress and status in the program. This will be based upon the student’s performance in courses (including testimonials of faculty, grades, and written course evaluations), their writing skills, their ability to complete work in a timely fashion, and their potential for independent scholarly research. All students will be notified in writing of the outcomes of the evaluation. Students who show good prospects for the Ph.D. program will be informed that they are making good progress in the program and are encouraged to continue. Students about whom there are some doubts as to their potential for the Ph.D. program will be advised that the second year is a critical training period for them to demonstrate that they will be able to perform at the Ph.D. level. In cases where continued work towards a Ph.D. is not encouraged, department procedures for academic probation and dismissal will be followed (these are detailed below). The intent of the first year evaluation is to keep students as informed as possible of their current status in the program and thus reduce any ambiguity and anxiety regarding their performance. The faculty also believe that students’ best interests are served by knowing as early as possible about any academic difficulties.
2. Second Year Evaluation of All Students. Passing the second year evaluation is a graduate school requirement for third year funding. The department also takes the opportunity at this time to assess each student’s performance at this point in their careers when they typically are making the shift from classroom student to researcher. The second year review involves discussion of each student in a faculty meeting, and a review of the student’s research interests. The student’s written work is reviewed by his/her adviser and proposal committee following subdisciplinary requirements. Feedback about the review is provided to the student by the academic adviser.
3. From the beginning of the third year a student’s progress is evaluated by their committee, which will always consist of a minimum of three full-time tenured or tenure-track members of the anthropology faculty. This committee has authority to set specific Ph.D. candidacy requirements for the student. The committee also recommends to the chair that a student be advanced to Ph.D. candidacy. Students who cannot identify three faculty members who are willing to serve on their committees are not considered to be making satisfactory academic progress.
4. Changing Academic Advisers and Committees. Students may change advisors and committee members at any time in their graduate career by finding new faculty members willing to take on such duties and by informing the chair of the department in writing. Any faculty member who opposes such changes may raise objections with the faculty committee responsible for the oversight of the status and progress of students.
5. Timely Progress to Degree. Students who are beyond the fourth semester and who have not yet received their A.M. degree, those beyond the sixth semester who have not been admitted to doctoral candidacy, and those beyond their sixth year since matriculation will be asked to document their recent progress toward their degree and their plans for the coming year. Students requesting formal leaves of absence will be asked to do so during these reviews. A faculty committee appointed by the chair and composed of members of each sub-discipline will review these proposals and make recommendations to the chair and graduate school regarding leaves of absence and formal extensions of the Graduate School’s four year rule for completion of masters degrees and seven year rule for completion of Ph.D.’s. For further details on these time limits, please see the sections of the General Requirements for Masters and Doctoral degrees in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Bulletin online. Department procedures for evaluation of academic performance are described above and in subdisciplinary requirements.
Procedures for Academic Probation and Dismissal
The following describes how the department implements The Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Policy on Probation and Dismissal for Academic Reasons
Academic performance of all Ph.D. students is reviewed on an annual basis by department faculty. The Department has designated the Graduate Advisory Committee (the Committee of Three) to manage decisions regarding placement on probation, removal from probation, recommendations for dismissal after a probationary period, and recommendations for immediate dismissal due to extreme underperformance.
This Committee is chaired by the Director of Graduate Studies and includes two other faculty members, with a representative from each of the sub-disciplines, Archaeology, Biological Anthropology and Sociocultural Anthropology. If it is determined by a vote of the majority of the Graduate Advisory Committee that the student is not satisfactorily meeting the academic requirements of the Program based on the above criteria, the Graduate Advisory Committee will consider whether the student should be placed on probation or if extreme underperformance warrants immediate dismissal from the Program, in accordance with the GSAS Policy on Probation and Dismissal for Academic Reasons. Normally, a probationary period would be no less than three months and, where probation criteria involve coursework, the probationary period will normally consist of one semester. However, there may be circumstances in which a student may be placed on probation for less than three months.
The student will be notified of the Graduate Advisory Committee decision in writing, including an explanation of academic performance issues leading to probation or immediate dismissal and, if applicable, any requirements for what must be done within a specified period of time during the probationary period in order for the student to return to good standing. The written probation letter should generally be accompanied by the opportunity for the student to meet with the Director of Graduate Studies or designated departmental faculty representatives for clarifying discussion(s), and copied to the Dean of GSAS.
All students on probationary status will be reviewed by Graduate Advisory Committee after each semester to determine whether the student should be (a) removed from probation and returned to good standing; (b) continued on probation; or (c) dismissed from the program.
The student will be notified of the decision of the Graduate Advisory Committee in writing.
If a student is dismissed from the program, the student will be notified in writing and will have the opportunity to appeal such dismissal in accordance with the GSAS Policy on Probation and Dismissal.